<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NovaInfosecPortal.com &#187; information cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novainfosecportal.com/tag/information-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novainfosecportal.com</link>
	<description>News, events, &#38; resources for infosec professionals in NoVA, DC, &#38; MD</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bye-Bye Passwords &#8211; Maybe?</title>
		<link>http://www.novainfosecportal.com/2008/08/14/bye-bye-passwords-maybe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.novainfosecportal.com/2008/08/14/bye-bye-passwords-maybe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grecs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infocard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nyt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single sign-on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sso]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novainfosecportal.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across an interesting New York Times story by Randall Stross over the weekend that discusses how we should be replacing passwords with information cards and how so-called single sign-on (SSO) services (e.g., OpenID and I&#8217;m sure any commercial product SSO efforts as well) just don&#8217;t add the security we need. Here are the relevant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across an interesting New York Times story by Randall Stross over the weekend that discusses how we should be replacing passwords with information cards and how so-called single sign-on (SSO) services (e.g., OpenID and I&#8217;m sure any commercial product SSO efforts as well) just don&#8217;t add the security we need. Here are the relevant snippets from the article:&#8221;The solution urged by the experts is to abandon passwords &#8211; and to move to a fundamentally different model, one in which humans play little or no part in logging on. Instead, machines have a cryptographically encoded conversation to establish both parties&#8217; authenticity, using digital keys that we, as users, have no need to see. In short, we need a log-on system that relies on cryptography, not mnemonics. As users, we would replace passwords with so-called information cards, icons on our screen that we select with a click to log on to a Web site. The click starts a handshake between machines that relies on hard-to-crack cryptographic code.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We won&#8217;t make much progress on information cards in the near future, however, because of wasted energy and attention devoted to a large distraction, the OpenID initiative. OpenID promotes &#8220;Single Sign-On&#8221;: with it, logging on to one OpenID Web site with one password will grant entrance during that session to all Web sites that accept OpenID credentials. OpenID offers, at best, a little convenience, and ignores the security vulnerability inherent in the process of typing a password into someone else&#8217;s Web site.&#8221;</p>
<p>Strangely enough, Microsoft seems to be involved in this new information card technology. It sounds a lot like Microsoft&#8217;s well-known CardSpace technology. As a matter of fact, Microsoft is part of a new Information Card Foundation (ICF) along with other heavyweights such as Equifax, Google, Novell, Oracle and PayPal. But then Microsoft is also a supporter of OpenID. How ironic&#8230;</p>
<p>The only issue I see with the way these information cards are them being desktop icons that you click to login as described in the New York Times story. When I&#8217;m logging into Windows at the beginning of the day, what do I do then? I won&#8217;t have access to these information card icons yet. Passwords anyone? Plus this doesn&#8217;t alleviate the problem of computers being infected with malware. If I can click it, a Trojan or virus can too. I agree with all the points about OpenID and other SSO efforts&#8230; but they&#8217;re such so darn convenient! There are a lot of questions that need to be addressed here and I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll all be learning a lot more about this technology as it evolves.</p>
<p>What do you think about this new authentication technology? Does your organization have plans to replace passwords with information cards? Here&#8217;s a link to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/technology/10digi.html?no_interstitial">New York Times article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.novainfosecportal.com/2008/08/14/bye-bye-passwords-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
